Follow us on Twitter Follow Us on Facebook

  DRC Home | Committees | Applicants Guide (PDF) | Submittals Checklist (PDF) |Application Form (PDF) | Agendas

Euclid Corridor Design Review Case Report

EUCLID LAKEVIEW APARTMENTS

Back Return to Case List | Start Over | Print Report (PDF format)

Project Information

Euclid Corridor Case #  EC 2016-008

Address: 12408 - 12418 Euclid Ave.
Company: RDL Architects
Architect: RDL Architects
Description:
Notes:  

Committee Actions/Submissions

Date: March 8, 2016
Committee: Staff
Action Type: Initial Plan Submission
Conditions/Notes:  
 
Date: March 17, 2016
Committee: Local Design Review Committee
Action Type: Approved with Conditions
Conditions:  

This review was for schematic approval.  The conditions include:

1) provide a traffic/circulation study (site is very tight) that show how a car can enter & exit parking space with dimensions noted (9'6")

2) Remove head-in parking spaces. This will allow building placement to be shifted to create larger greenspace

3) Return with details for exterior materials and finishes

4) Provide details for trash and snow removal

 
Date: March 18, 2016
Committee: City Planning Commission
Action Type: Approved
Conditions:  

Schematic Design Approval.

Date: April 7, 2016
Committee: Staff
Action Type: Revised Plan Submission
Conditions/Notes:  

* Applicant is being requested to make changes immediately and send digitally to staff for distribution to Committee members.  It is recommended that applicant attend the next scheduled Design Review meeting (May 5th) to present changes for approval prior to returning to the Planning Commission.

NOTE: 2 OF THE 4 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE MARCH 17TH MEETING WERE NOT MET REGARDING PARKING AND CIRCULATION ISSUES.

 
Date: April 14, 2016
Committee: Local Design Review Committee
Action Type: Tabled
Conditions:  

Issues related to parking in the site plan that should be resolved prior to final Planning Commission approval;

1) Provide a handicap accessible parking space that will result in a reduced space adjacent to the courtyard. This would allow Bldg B to be shifted left and reduce the traffic conflict between the visitor parking spaces with residents' ingress and egress of the garage units.

2) Not enough clearance between Bldgs B & D with the adjacent Bldg E for visitor parking. Ingress & egress from Bldg E garages will create a potential traffic conflict.

3) Surface parking conflicts with egress from south end of Bldgs B & D with parking space situated in front of door. Change head in parking to parallel space and provide a 9' striped lane at egress door.

4) Materials - window frames color should be white or brown (not tan).

5) Vinyl siding & EIFS should have appropriate detailing for corners & flashing for aesthetics.

 
Date: April 15, 2016
Committee: City Planning Commission
Action Type: Approved with Conditions
Conditions:  

Approved Demolitions and Project with revised site plan with Condition that the DRAC's five issues are resolved by the applicant.